False Promise of Marriage: HC Dismisses Rape Allegation Filed by Married Woman

Given that the woman is already married, it is hard to believe that she could be misled into thinking marriage was possible, the defense lawyer argued.
Bombay High Court
Bombay High CourtThe Bridge Chronicle / Manoranjan Mishra
Published on

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has rejected a rape allegation made by a married woman on the grounds of a false promise of marriage.

The court, while granting anticipatory bail to the accused, Vishal Shinde, emphasized that a married woman cannot claim to be misled by the promise of marriage when both she and the accused are already married.

Justice Manish Pitale, presiding over the case, noted that the complainant, who is married, knew that marriage to the accused was not possible. Therefore, the court found no basis for the claim that she had been coerced into sexual relations under false pretenses.

Bombay High Court
Man Charged for Exploiting Woman with False Promise of Marriage, Coercing Abortion

The case revolves around allegations made by a woman against Vishal Shinde, a man she accused of befriending her, making promises of marriage, and subsequently engaging in sexual relations with her.

The complainant also claimed that Shinde had threatened to release compromising videos of her online if she refused his advances. However, Shinde denied all accusations, and no evidence of any video being released was presented before the court.

During the court proceedings, Shinde’s lawyer argued that the accused had fully cooperated with the investigation, including submitting his mobile phone to the authorities for examination.

This, according to the defense, raised doubts about the credibility of the complainant’s claims. "Given that the woman is already married, it is hard to believe that she could be misled into thinking marriage was possible," Shinde’s lawyer contended.

Bombay High Court
Cybercriminals Force Woman to Disrobe Under False Investigation Pretext

Justice Pitale made a critical observation while passing the judgment, stating, "The complainant is a married woman. She cannot claim to have been exploited under the pretext of a false promise of marriage. Since she is already married, and the accused is also married, it was clear that no marriage could have occurred between them. Therefore, the basis of the accusation, which rests on a 'false promise of marriage,' does not hold."

Enjoyed reading The Bridge Chronicle?
Your support motivates us to do better. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Whatsapp to stay updated with the latest stories.
You can also read on the go with our Android and iOS mobile app.

Related Stories

No stories found.
logo
The Bridge Chronicle
www.thebridgechronicle.com