Legal Challenge to 'Ladki Bahin' Scheme, Claims It Encourages Begging Lifestyle

Notice, sent by senior journalist and political analyst Vinay Hardikar through Adv Aseem Sarode, raises concerns over timing of the scheme's launch.
Ladki Bahin Scheme
Ladki Bahin SchemeThe Bridge Chronicle
Published on

Pune: A legal notice has been served to Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, Finance Minister Ajit Pawar, the Chief Secretary, and the Ministry of Women and Child Development, alleging that the recently launched ‘Ladki Bahin' scheme by the Mahayuti government promotes a life of begging and fails to provide permanent employment opportunities.

The notice claims that distributing funds for political advantage undermines the principles of a welfare state and indicates that the scheme is politically motivated, aimed at garnering votes in the upcoming elections.

Ladki Bahin Scheme
Banks Impose Minimum Balance Fees on 'Majhi Ladki Bahin Scheme' Payouts

The notice, sent by senior journalist and political analyst Vinay Hardikar through Advocate Aseem Sarode, raises concerns over the timing of the scheme's launch, just before the assembly elections.

Hardikar demands clarification from the government on how the scheme is expected to enhance women’s financial independence, health, and nutrition with only ₹1,500.

The scheme's annual cost is projected to be ₹46,000 crores. The notice further reveals that the Maharashtra government has covertly borrowed ₹3,000 crores from the Reserve Bank to fund the scheme, a fact that remains hidden from the public.

Ladki Bahin Scheme
Long Journeys, High Hopes: Women Join 'Ladki Bahin Yojana' Inauguration

Hardikar argues that if the scheme had been implemented following the elections, allowing women to benefit over a five-year span, its purpose would not be questioned. Instead, it has been introduced merely to secure electoral votes.

The notice points out that the scheme places an undue burden on the state’s treasury, violating financial responsibility and budget management laws, which expect a maximum financial deficit of three percent.

Instead, the implementation of the scheme has resulted in a 4.6 percent increase in the financial deficit, and the assertion that the scheme will generate employment is described as unfounded and misleading.

Enjoyed reading The Bridge Chronicle?
Your support motivates us to do better. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Whatsapp to stay updated with the latest stories.
You can also read on the go with our Android and iOS mobile app.

Related Stories

No stories found.
logo
The Bridge Chronicle
www.thebridgechronicle.com